The Cutting Case, 1887, Mexico Vs USA
The Cutting Case, 1887, Mexico Vs USA PRINCIPLE: Any state can apply his jurisdiction beyond his territorial on the foreign citizen if the act of foreign citizen is done, which was a violation of...
Category: Case
Case Note on The Chorzow Factory ( Germany v Poland, 1928)
Introduction: This is a case about violation of international agreement known as “The Chorzow Factory Case”. The question before the court was whether Poland can be made liable for such violation of an international...
Barcelona Traction Light and Power Co ltd (Belgium V Spain, ICJ 1970)
Barcelona Traction Light and Power Co ltd (Belgium V Spain, ICJ 1970) Principle: Companies are separate entity in the eye of law. Fact: The Barcelona Traction, Light and Power Co. Ltd., (hereinafter called Barcelona...
The Chorzow Factory Case (1928, Germany v Poland)
The Chorzow Factory Case (1928, Germany v Poland) Principle: It is a general principle of law as well as International law, that any breach of agreement creates an obligation to make reparation. Fact: There was an agreement between...
North Sea Continental Shelf case
North Sea Continental Shelf cases, ICJ Reps, 1969, p. 3 at 44 Principle: Ratification after signature is required to consequently make that party liable to obey the treaty. Fact: On 1 December 1964, the Federal Republic...
Lotus Case (France V Turkey, PCIJ 1927)
Lotus Case (France V Turkey, PCIJ 1927) Principle: To be customary International Law there must be some legal obligation (Opinio juris) or force to maintain the customs not because merely they want to. Fact: On...
Asylum Case (Columbia v. Peru, 1950)
Asylum Case (Columbia v. Peru, 1950) Principle: For Custom to be definitively proven, it must be continuously and uniformly executed. Fact: Peru issued an arrest warrant against Victor Raul Haya de la Torre “in...
The Scotia Case (USA vs. UK, 1871)
The Scotia Case (USA vs. UK, 1871) Principle: Some customs need not to be ancient to become an International law rather if it is specified and accepted and also maintained by numbers of nations...
The Republic of Nicaragua v The United States of America 1986
The Republic of Nicaragua v The United States of America 1986 Principle There is no customary rule in International Law permitting a State to exercise the right of collective self-defense in another country on...
Temple of Preah Vihear (Cambodia v. Thailand, 1962, ICJ)
Temple of Preah Vihear (Cambodia v. Thailand, 1962, ICJ) Principle: Principle of acquiescence International law uses of principle of equity, which is a principle of law used in civilized nation and international law adopted...
TUKU MIAH V. THE STATE — 3 BLD 193
Fact: On 27-10-75 the informant PW1 Whahid ali’s on Bablu returned home after dusk with his moveable stationary shop form lathiganj hat. He had his night meal and was taking rest in the courtyard,...
LUTFUN NAHAR BEGUM VS THE STATE — 27 DLR 29
Fact: Lutrun Nahar Begum, the appellant along with three persons, namely Sadhan Kumar Mali, Surid Chandra Das and Nagar Bashis were committed to the Court of Sessions for trial, in connection with the murder...
MOBARAK HOSSAIN V. THE STATE — 3 BLD 329
Fact: Zillu, a servant of Bazlur Rahman committed theft in his house and had stolen gold ornaments and sold it away which was detected by Abdur Rouf and reported to Bazlur Rahman, who put...
ZAINUL ABEDIN & OTHERS V. THE STATE — 3 BLD 108
Fact: On 25th of Magh 1383 B.S. at about 9 P.M. Manzila Khatun went out of the hut for making water by the said of the well and she was suddenly caught hold of...
PHANI BHUSAN HALDER VS THE STATE — 27 DLR (1975) 254
Fact: On 28th May, 1973 some B.D.R personnel headed by Havilder Obaidul Hoque were on petrol duty at Gabindhakati under P.S. Sathkhira in district of Khulna and at 4 pm they arrested at the...
ABDUL QUDDUS & ANOTHER V. THE STATE — 3 BLD 18
Fact: Ferdousi Begum aged around 16 at that time, when went to her maternal grandparents house, on 27th April 1979 when she came out to answer the call of nature, accused-appellants Abul Hossain and...
Reasonable Restriction
By the word ‘reasonable restriction’ we easily understand restriction of a person or group of persons which is reasonable to the betterment or safeguard for the general people of the society. That means if...
